ONE HUNDRED STARS

_____

BREAKING NEWS

The Nation of Earth now has a website. It's just one page for now, and I've had the page for months without adding content, but content is finally there: http://earthpatrol.googlepages.com/home

ONE HUNDRED STARS

In this post I will be presenting the case -- from my perspective -- for the North American Union. If you are offended at the very mention of such a thing, please bear with me and try to keep an open mind.

First of all, let me tell you that I am as opposed as anyone to any cryptocratic plan of merging Canada, Mexico, and the United States into a new and larger oligarchy. If they were allowed to form the union from the top down, present 'leaders' would be able to continue to trample upon the rights of the People. It would be yet another case of too few holding power over too many, and on a larger scale. No surprise that this idea would not be well-received.

If the union were to be formed from the bottom up, however, we would have the opportunity to, in effect, peaceably overthrow the national governments of all three countries -- emphasis on 'PEACEABLY'. The 99 States, Provinces, and Territories that comprise Canada, Mexico, and the United States could theoretically form a new government to replace the constitutional monarchy of Canada, the federal republic of Mexico, and the transparent oligarchy pretending to be a republic in between. This could be seen as a preemptive measure, taken to ensure the rights of the individual States, Provinces, and Territories and the rights of the People.

The title of this post refers to my idea for a flag for the North American Union (or my idea of what the NAU could be), which is a field of 100 white stars against a blue background. 10 Canadian Provinces, 3 Territories; 31 Mexican States; 50 United States, 5 Territories = 99. We'll throw an extra one in there in case I missed something...

HISTORY

Before the Mexican-American War, a large section of the current southwestern United States was part of Mexico. Disputes over the boundaries of the former Republic of Texas (itself once part of Mexico) started the war, during which some supported the idea of annexing the entire country. Mexico lost almost half of its territory to the United States. Just imagine how strong Mexico would be now, if it had retained its original borders... Or, imagine if all of Mexico had been annexed.

In 1849, the Montreal Annexation Manifesto was published by Canadians in support of breaking ties with Great Britain and joining the United States, but the movement lasted no longer than five years (though it has never completely died out). Once again, imagine.

Over the span of a decade in the middle of the 19th Century, these three countries could have become one. 150 years later, the possibility returns...

In 2005, the South American Community of Nations was formed. On April 16th of this year, its name was changed to "Union of South American Nations". Its population exceeds that of the USA by over 70 million.

These multinational unions have been popping up all over the world. Various agreements between the three major nations of North America can be considered to be precursors to a North American Union. Some say it's inevitable.

How much can we learn from the existing unions? Can we avoid the mistakes they've made? Is there a way for us to ensure a better future for all North Americans, by forming our own union? Do we dare leave it up to the heads of our current governments?

JUST MY OPINION

I say, before 'they' have a chance to put us all in a triple headlock, we should join hands between Nunavut and Chiapas, and from Guam to Newfoundland, to form a union not of our three countries, but of all our 99 States, Provinces, and Territories. This may be our one opportunity to throw the establishment out on its collective ear.

It may also be an opportunity to form a new kind of union, one with more localized representation within its supranational body. Further, it could lay the groundwork for truly representational government within a future Global Union.

Of course we do not want a Global Union, or even a North American Union, unless we can know that such a body will not contribute to the growing problem of political corruption. Quite the opposite -- what we want is to be forever free from the shadow of the "New World Order". To accomplish that, we may have to institute a new order of our own.



Views such as I have expressed above are, at the time of this writing, protected under the First Amendment. Please remember that I do not advocate violence.




Phil Smith
November 26, 2007

_____

What Is and What Should Never Be

_____

Yes, I borrowed the title of this post from a Led Zeppelin song...

THE GOOD NEWS

The good news is that Chrysler plans to reveal three new concept vehicles at the Detroit show in January that indicate they have a clue as to the direction in which the automotive industry is inevitably headed. However only one of them is a pure electric; The other two are evidence that Chrysler still has a lot to learn.

I'm sure there's better news out there, and a lot of it...

THE BAD NEWS

Not all of this will be 'news' to all of you...

You may be aware, or may have suspected, that AIDS was engineered; You may or may not have understood WHY. Well, it seems that the powers that be have had a depopulation agenda for several decades, one that borders on being a plan for genocide. For some unfathomable reason, not only AIDS but orchestrated famine and localized warfare are being implemented to reduce a specific population, one race in particular.

Personally, I would be much less offended at a plan to reduce the GENERAL population -- which is not to say there isn't one, an unwholesome one at that. Targeting a specific race for 'reduction' is bigotry in its worst possible form.

Visit these pages and try not to get incensed:

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/191107_merck_depopulation.html

http://www.schillerinstitute.org/food_for_peace/kiss_nssm_jb_1995.html

Learning of this brings new light to Katrina. If you ever wondered why things were handled they way they were in New Orleans after the storm, well, you know what skin color most of the victims had. Once again, if it doesn't make you sick enough that people's lives are given so little regard...

While we're on the subject of engineered weather, consider this season's cyclones. Southeast Asia has been hit hard with typhoon after typhoon, while we've seen a mild season over on this hemisphere. A climatologist may try to ponder the reasons for this (and may even come up with an 'explanation'), but someone who has accepted engineered weather as fact is left to wonder what the powers that be are up to...

Maybe they think that we in the 'West' need a break from this particular sort of 'natural' disaster, and maybe they also think that Southeast Asia is a 'good' place to continue depopulation efforts. Don't think for a moment that they'll stop using their equipment. They've got to mess with the weather somewhere, and it's bound to be bad for someone.

I can't convince you of the reality of weather control if you don't want to accept it, but please know that it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious to me if there weren't some logic behind it. Look up Project Storm Fury. Then ask yourself why such a program would be halted.

While it would make sense to anyone of sound mind to continue to develop weather control for the obvious benefits it could bring to Humankind, it makes perfect sense to the twisted minds of the power-hungry to deny its existence while developing it as a weapon. Throw in the idea of racially-skewed "population control" and maybe you'll recognize Katrina as having been a planned disaster -- and you'll understand why FEMA failed so miserably. They were meant to.

THE CHALLENGE

When I first thought of the Unified Settlement, I never imagined the depths to which the cryptocracy can sink. As the information trickles in, we find more and more evidence that 'they' are indeed 'out to get us'. The people (if we can call them that, soulless as they appear to be) who are ultimately in control of all those things which affect everyone else the most, do not seem to care one bit about their fellow Humans. I cannot imagine, for the life of me, how anyone can view their actions as being for the greater good.

The challenge before us is to remove these 'people' from power. We must take away their ability to control the weather. We must obliterate their influence over governments. We must keep them from influencing the media in any way or form. We must keep them from formulating and utilizing biological weapons of any kind. We must expose their secrets, especially those relating to technology that can be used to further the sustainable future of Humankind and our present habitat, Planet Earth.

We do NOT have a population problem. Regardless of how our number may grow over the coming decades and centuries, we will be able to find solutions and accommodate everyone. Population numbers are only a problem in the perception of those who wish to remain in control through deceptive manipulation.

Those behind the scenes are depriving us from a representative democracy, while attempting to fool us into believing one is in place. This cannot, and will not, stand. Either they will have to step things up and openly enslave us -- a situation from which we would be sure to revolt -- or they will have to succumb to the pressure of the People and become accountable.

Before the powers that be begin to think wide-scale martial law will be necessary (and don't think they haven't already planned for it, and thought it might be a handy way to help reduce the population) the People need to act -- and not in such a way as to provoke violence.

In order to be able to apply the proper amount of pressure, the People must be organized. It is not nearly enough for the many of us to be aware of what's going on, if we do not spread the word. Even if the majority of the population were aware, that in itself would not be enough. We need a (peaceful) plan of action, and we need to plan for several stages.

It is one thing to look at our situation and realize the only way to change it is by rallying millions to the cause, and it is another thing entirely to plan such a campaign. As much as I try to understand people, it's not my strong suit. However I have a few ideas...

GETTING STARTED

There was once a website up for the Unified Settlement, but the hosting for it dissolved before the name was changed to the Nation of Earth. I do have a free space provided by Google where I can create a Nation of Earth website, but I have yet to approach its development. Quite frankly, it's difficult to present the idea of this movement to those who have never heard of it -- but I'll try.

I feel we ought to recruit activist organizations, one by one, to become part of the Nation of Earth. There are a great many of them, all working in one way or another toward similar (and at times identical) goals -- imagine if they were all brought together, still doing what they have been, but as part of a larger movement...

At some point the movement will attract the attention and support of celebrities. Some of them will gladly spend time and money to produce video for the Nation of Earth. A feature-length DVD is not out of the question. You can see how well this could work to raise awareness -- but it's a ways down the line from where we are now.

As of this writing, there are perhaps two or three dozen people who have heard of the Nation of Earth, most of whom belong to small forums that I have initiated. My hope is that some of them will chime in, as they did in the early days of the Unified Settlement forum, with ideas and feedback.

Ideas and feedback are welcome from anyone reading this. I can't do this alone.




Phil Smith
November 23, 2007

______