_____
Six years is a long time. Then again, so is sixty-six...
Sixty-six years ago, there was something new in Hawaii. It was called 'radar'. Originally invented by Nikola Tesla and developed independently in various countries, it was brought over by the British. Radar had been giving early warnings in England for years...
Fast-forward to December 7th, 1941. Poorly trained radar operators -- just a few low-ranking enlisted men -- weren't sure what they were seeing. They phoned in their observation, but it wasn't taken seriously.
My question is: If a perceived threat is strong enough for a buildup of equipment and personnel at Pearl Harbor, why was the battle-proven radar system not given a higher priority?
The attack itself would've been enough to plunge the United States into World War Two. Better, though, if it could be a successful ambush -- more devastation, more outrage.
It has been established that the United States military had previously developed a scenario for a possible Japanese attack, and that the Japanese followed that scenario to the letter.
Coincidence? And what about the radar? Incompetence? Or were there orders to keep technology from spoiling a conspiracy?
Six decades later, and nine months after the pilot episode of a TV show called The Lone Gunmen featured a commercial airliner being flown into the World Trade Center... Well, we all know what happened.
Or do we?
Nikola Tesla also invented remote (radio) control (along with radio itself). We know that NASA and the FAA successfully flew (and crashed -- the crash was the point) a Boeing 720 by remote control in December of 1984: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Impact_Demonstration
It has been stated that, subsequently, all commercial aircraft were fitted with systems allowing remote takeover in the event of hijacking (or the effective disabling of all available pilots onboard). Even if that is not the case, 1984 technology made it possible to remotely control a large aircraft to slam into a precise target...
I've jumped to conclusions in the past, and repeated things I've read that struck me as true -- sometimes with regret, later on. I can't know what really happened. Theories abound. However, there are important questions we should all be asking...
- In view of history, can we put it past 'them'?
- Haven't the developments since 2001 been profitable for the few?
- Aren't there huge flaws in the official story?
You know what? I'm sick of it. You know what else? I'm not done talking about it. As much as I wish we could all simply bow our heads in remembrance (as very few do anymore on December 7th) we have to keep raising a stink until all is revealed.
Here are some videos to share with those who still don't get it:
9/11 - Mysterious Flash Occurring During Plane Impact
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri7rZ6Bi6C8
UA 93 Crash- An investigation into the given theories.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIs5V5f5zeo
Molten Metal WTC Thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk
For that last one, you might want to spare yourself some grief and stop the video (or mute the sound) when the camera operator says of the helicopter, "not trying to land". Just after that, the first tower collapses and the screaming begins.
No matter how many times you see footage, the shock and horror of it won't go away.
"Wake me up when September ends."
- Green Day
One more video for you and your friends:
Perhaps you should show them Carlin first.
Phil Smith
September 11, 2007
_____
No comments:
Post a Comment