Sunday, September 23, 2007

The Red, White, Blue, and Yellow Peril

_____



The subject of this blog post MAY or MAY NOT become an issue. Let's hope it doesn't, but just in case...


Someone's assertion has come to my attention, that the shadow governments of the United States and China have been working on a plan for war -- yes, against one another. The very idea of it may seem preposterous, but to me it passes the intuitive reasoning test for plausibility... Now bear with me while I extrapolate...


About this time next year, unless we can do something about it, this new war will begin (according to the assertion).

The American 'Civil' War turned out to be bad for the economy, but soon thereafter arms manufacturers saw great profit in military contracts. There would not have been so many Colt 'Peacemaker' revolvers made otherwise.

Follow the money. Maybe the 'Great War' (World War I) wasn't a great success, but WWII was just AWESOME for the American economy. Don't even ask me what Korea or Vietnam were about, but it's well-known how certain companies have been profiting from the Iraq war.

In the proposed war with China, well, maybe it will be good for manufacturers worldwide who step in to fill the gap -- Americans are used to having a lot of cheap crap to buy -- but there is another agenda this time around.

Population control is the issue. This planet can only sustain so many Humans, and even the Chinese recognize that there are too many Chinese. What better way to knock down the headcount than by going to war with the United States?

The logical solution to our population problem would be to colonize Space, but 'they' don't want to give up the secrets that would make such a thing possible. No. To the uncaring, unfeeling shadow government(s), war brings profit plus reduces the population, two birds with one stone.

I really feel for the Chinese if this war is allowed to begin. Despite their number, their opposition will have an extreme technological advantage. The plan may include strikes on American soil, but the loss-of-life ratio will be tremendously unbalanced...


IF


IF we the people allow 'them' to wage this war, no matter if it's the last order of an outgoing President, it'd be less than pointless -- in my opinion. War is bullshit. There is no reasonable motivation for us to go around killing each other. None at all.


"Whose assertion was it?" You may have asked this question already... He is identified only as 'Henry Deacon' (a pseudonym) on the Project Camelot website... Oh, and now you're asking about Project Camelot itself. They're all about disclosure there, and they've posted many interviews of very credible people saying incredible things.

Concerning what 'Deacon' had to say about 9/11:

"
We are of course under no illusions about the importance of this. Five years after the event, Henry may be the first insider to come forward with confirmation that 9/11 was an inside job."

Go to the Camelot link above, then to interviews, and the 'Henry Deacon' transcript. Before that you might want to watch the interviews with Bob Dean and Marcia Schafer here. It is important that you know what Project Camelot does, and those interviews demonstrate it very well...

What did 'Henry Deacon' have to say about an upcoming war with China?

"
I know that there’s a planned war between the US and China scheduled for late 2008. This is also geopolitical and not concerned with Black Ops as such. These were both just events that I got to hear about in passing. I have no detailed information about them.

"The Pentagon started the planning in 1998. You have to understand that China and the US are hand in glove with everything. This war is a joint op between the US and China. Most wars are set up that way and have been for a while."

This brief mention was enough to (pardon the expression) raise a red flag.

One can imagine that, within the next year or so, problems with trade between the United States and China could lead to an embargo. China would be understandably incensed, since the United States (of America, just to be clear -- Australia is also abbreviated USA) has become so heavily indebted to China through financial loans that China effectively owns the States.

The indebtedness, if we are to assume 'Henry Deacon' is correct,
has been part of a long-term plan. If we buy into this scenario, we might guess that tainted goods supplied to 'America' by Chinese manufacturers (and China's lack of cooperation concerning inspection of production facilities) are the beginning of a campaign of distrust.

It doesn't matter where on Earth we're from. People are people, Humans are Humans. Really, it's perfectly normal if you feel for the people in China who slave away to produce a whole lot of crap that 'Americans' will consume without thinking. The majority of people everywhere are merely doing what they think they need to do -- and if we suddenly find that China and the USA are 'enemies', and that portions of both populations are suddenly committed to war, well, that will fall into the category of things that people think they need to do.

The war, if it is allowed to happen, will come as a slow surprise. Things will escalate, an announcement will be made, and BOOM.

It may be planned (and this seems likely, to me) that it will be China that declares war. It wouldn't make sense to Americans, after all, to get ourselves involved in yet another conflict without provocation (or at least I'd like to think so).

What most everyone will miss (once again, IF it is allowed to happen) is that the whole thing will have been orchestrated by the cryptocratic oligarchs (consult a dictionary if need be, or trust my definition of 'cryptocratic oligarchs' as 'those who rule in secret, for the benefit of the few').

Right now, if you haven't already
, you might want to start checking labels for the phrase 'Made In China' before deciding on a purchase. This has nothing to do with the Chinese in general, of course -- they're just people. It has everything to do with whatever it is that the cryptocratic oligarchy has up their collective sleeve. I suspect that, just when we're starting to feel safe about Chinese goods again, there'll be some massive poisoning of a cross-section of 'Americans' from some imported item...


To those of you who are new to this blog: I am not a 'conspiracy theorist'. Sure, I may in this very post be theorizing about a possible conspiracy -- but I prefer the term 'conspiratologist'. I study conspiracy. From what I've seen, I would certainly not put it past the cryptocratic oligarchy to arrange a war between the "United States of America" and the "People's Republic of China".

This post is a WARNING.

It is also a call to grassroots activists everywhere, to look into the situation and -- if substantiation can be found -- raise public awareness, mount protests, et cetera.


Overpopulation is a serious issue -- I won't dispute that. Our beloved Earth cannot sustain our growing number for much longer. However we must not be treated like an infestation, or like a population of deer that are starving themselves in a habitat that we Humans have encroached upon. We have the resources to sustain a growing population, here on Earth for now and off-planet in the near future.

The problem is that those who currently run things have their priorities seriously skewed. They continue to demonstrate that they do NOT have Humanity's best interests in mind.


About five and a half years from now, those of us who will have survived will be living in a completely different world. We may, on the one hand, look back and realize that the number of lives lost do not necessarily correspond to the number of souls damaged. On the other hand, we may regret how much suffering was allowed to happen.

We have to ask ourselves: What kind of recent history do we want to represent us when it comes time to 'officially' enter 'Galactic Society'? Could we not have, can we not now, prevent certain atrocities?


Ah, but if it is China who declares war, how can anyone prevent 'America' from retaliating? Somehow we must stop this before the plan gets that far...


Think positive.



Phil Smith
September 25, 2007



_____

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Technology Gets In the Way

_____




Six years is a long time. Then again, so is sixty-six...

Sixty-six years ago, there was something new in Hawaii. It was called 'radar'. Originally invented by Nikola Tesla and developed independently in various countries, it was brought over by the British. Radar had been giving early warnings in England for years...

Fast-forward to December 7th, 1941. Poorly trained radar operators -- just a few low-ranking enlisted men -- weren't sure what they were seeing. They phoned in their observation, but it wasn't taken seriously.

My question is: If a perceived threat is strong enough for a buildup of equipment and personnel at Pearl Harbor, why was the battle-proven radar system not given a higher priority?

The attack itself would've been enough to plunge the United States into World War Two. Better, though, if it could be a successful ambush -- more devastation, more outrage.

It has been established that the United States military had previously developed a scenario for a possible Japanese attack, and that the Japanese followed that scenario to the letter.

Coincidence? And what about the radar? Incompetence? Or were there orders to keep technology from spoiling a conspiracy?



Six decades later, and nine months after the pilot episode of a TV show called The Lone Gunmen featured a commercial airliner being flown into the World Trade Center... Well, we all know what happened.

Or do we?

Nikola Tesla also invented remote (radio) control (along with radio itself). We know that NASA and the FAA successfully flew (and crashed -- the crash was the point) a Boeing 720 by remote control in December of 1984: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Impact_Demonstration

It has been stated that, subsequently, all commercial aircraft were fitted with systems allowing remote takeover in the event of hijacking (or the effective disabling of all available pilots onboard). Even if that is not the case, 1984 technology made it possible to remotely control a large aircraft to slam into a precise target...


I've jumped to conclusions in the past, and repeated things I've read that struck me as true -- sometimes with regret, later on. I can't know what really happened. Theories abound. However, there are important questions we should all be asking...

  1. In view of history, can we put it past 'them'?
  2. Haven't the developments since 2001 been profitable for the few?
  3. Aren't there huge flaws in the official story?

You know what? I'm sick of it. You know what else? I'm not done talking about it. As much as I wish we could all simply bow our heads in remembrance (as very few do anymore on December 7th) we have to keep raising a stink until all is revealed.

Here are some videos to share with those who still don't get it:


9/11 - Mysterious Flash Occurring During Plane Impact

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri7rZ6Bi6C8


UA 93 Crash- An investigation into the given theories.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIs5V5f5zeo


Molten Metal WTC Thermite

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk



For that last one, you might want to spare yourself some grief and stop the video (or mute the sound) when the camera operator says of the helicopter, "not trying to land". Just after that, the first tower collapses and the screaming begins.


No matter how many times you see footage, the shock and horror of it won't go away.

"Wake me up when September ends."
- Green Day


One more video for you and your friends:


video


Perhaps you should show them Carlin first.



Phil Smith
September 11, 2007



_____